Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| ai:flux2 [2026/04/02 23:00] – [Environment Complexity] mh | ai:flux2 [2026/06/30 22:45] (current) – mh | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== FLUX.2 ====== | ====== FLUX.2 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | < | ||
| ===== General ===== | ===== General ===== | ||
| - | When asked for realism or cinematic quality, the model **sacrifices composition** width to **maximize perceived fidelity**. | + | Flux.2 **prioritizes literal prompt execution, subject clarity, and controlled visual construction** over expressive interpretation, |
| + | |||
| + | It exhibits **solid baseline competence** across portraits, neutral bodies, simple objects, interiors, landscapes, atmospheric scenes, materials, and physics-style prompts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The model **performs best when the task is concrete and visually bounded**, especially with objects, macro photography, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Human motion, hands, hybrid anatomy, city logic, extreme scale, and fashion energy are more fragile**, often becoming stiff, artificial, composited, overly illustrative, | ||
| + | |||
| + | **Outputs are stable and often usable**, but **the model tends to fall into generic | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Main DNA Traits ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | === 🧬 Literal Construction === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The model follows prompt categories directly and builds clear visual answers without much semantic expansion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //It gives you what was asked, but rarely adds a hidden layer of intent// | ||
| + | |||
| + | === 🧬 Concrete Subject Strength === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The model is strongest when the prompt has a clear object, material, atmosphere, or bounded visual problem to solve. | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Objects, surfaces, particles, patterns, and simple scenes are safer ground than complex living systems// | ||
| + | |||
| + | === 🧬 Fragile Complexity === | ||
| + | |||
| + | The model weakens when it must resolve dynamic anatomy, real urban logic, impossible scale, layered storytelling, | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Strengths ==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | | ||
| + | * clear subject focus | ||
| + | * solid composition | ||
| + | * credible simple atmosphere | ||
| + | * strong material effects | ||
| + | * good pattern and rune handling | ||
| + | * stable, usable images | ||
| ===== Atlas ===== | ===== Atlas ===== | ||
| Line 32: | Line 80: | ||
| ^ **Structured** | ^ **Structured** | ||
| - | | | | | | | + | | |
| ^ **Chaotic** | ^ **Chaotic** | ||
| - | | | | | | | + | | |
| //Batches were run in march 2026.// | //Batches were run in march 2026.// | ||
| - | ===== Prompts ===== | ||
| - | === 🧙 Fantasy | + | ==== Human Anatomy ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Portrait** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, realistic materials, fantasy aesthetic, subtle magical atmosphere, faint arcane motifs, soft ambient glow, grounded realism | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🎬 Cinematographic | + | ==== Mythic ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Warrior** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🔍 Hyper-realistic | + | ==== Environment ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Landscape** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, realistic materials, hyper-realistic, ultra detailed textures, physically accurate materials, high fidelity surface detail, neutral lighting | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === ✏️ Stylized Illustration | + | ==== Storytelling ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Single Object** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, stylized illustration, | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🎨 Painterly / Fine Art === | + | ==== Lighting & Atmosphere ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Volumetric Fog** ^ **Neon Cyberpunk** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, painterly, fine art style, visible brush strokes, rich texture, expressive lighting, canvas-like rendering | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🌈 Bright Whimsical | + | ==== Materials & Physics ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Water Splash** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, bright whimsical style, vibrant colors, soft rounded forms, playful atmosphere, light and airy mood | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🧩 Graphic / Design | + | ==== Structure & Symbols ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Perfect Symmetry** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, graphic design style, bold shapes, flat colors, high contrast, minimal shading, poster-like composition | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🧪 Technical / Scan-like | + | ==== Extended Probes ==== |
| - | <code txt> | + | ^ **Macro Photography** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, realistic materials, technical scan-like, flat even lighting, orthographic feel, high clarity, documentation style, minimal artistic interpretation | + | | {{: |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🌤 Soft Natural (Baseline) === | + | //Batches were run in april 2026.// |
| - | <code txt> | ||
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | ||
| - | </ | ||
| - | === ⚡ High Contrast | + | ===== Expanded DNA ===== |
| - | <code txt> | + | === 🔹 1. Literal Construction (Primary Rule) === |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === 🌫 Volumetric Fog === | + | **The model responds to prompts by constructing the requested category directly, with limited interpretive expansion.** |
| - | <code txt> | + | __Evidence: |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, | + | * portrait and full body are correct, credible, and proportionally solid |
| - | </ | + | * single object is simple |
| + | * readable text is handled correctly | ||
| + | * aerial top-down becomes | ||
| + | * overexposed prompt is taken almost too literally, burning | ||
| - | === 🌈 Neon / Emissive === | + | 👉 //The model obeys before it interprets// |
| - | <code txt> | + | __Why it matters:__ |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | * Pros: predictable, direct, easy to test, useful for controlled prompts |
| - | </ | + | * Cons: weakens surprise, narrative depth, and artistic re-interpretation |
| - | === 🌑 Dark Moody (Low Key) === | + | ---- |
| - | <code txt> | + | === 🔹 2. Concrete Subject Reliability === |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | === ☀️ Overexposed Bright === | + | **The model is strongest when the prompt revolves around a bounded subject, object, material, symbol, or simple environmental setup.** |
| - | <code txt> | + | __Evidence: |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | * single object feels valued through warm studio-like presentation |
| - | </ | + | * complex pattern produces |
| + | * macro photography is credible | ||
| + | * reflective material is one of the strongest physics outputs | ||
| + | * impact gives convincing energy and motion | ||
| - | === 🔦 Directional Spotlight === | + | 👉 //The model handles concrete visual problems better than open dramatic scenes// |
| - | <code txt> | + | __Why it matters:__ |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic | + | * Pros: strong for objects, materials, |
| - | </ | + | * Cons: less reliable for scenes that require deep world logic or dramatic integration |
| - | 👉 Tests: subject isolation, shadow sharpness, light discipline | + | ---- |
| + | |||
| + | === 🔹 3. Baseline Human Competence, Weak Anatomy Edge Cases === | ||
| + | |||
| + | **The model can produce acceptable humans in simple situations, but breaks down when anatomy becomes dynamic, close, or structurally demanding.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Evidence: | ||
| + | * portrait is correct and solid | ||
| + | * full body has good proportions and neutral credibility | ||
| + | * dynamic motion is exaggerated and physically bizarre | ||
| + | * close-up hands and nails feel off, weird, and AI-like | ||
| + | * small group has correct anatomy but fake, exaggerated emotional tone | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //Simple people pass; complex bodies reveal the seams// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters:__ | ||
| + | * Pros: usable for neutral figures and straightforward human subjects | ||
| + | * Cons: risky for hands, motion, subtle gesture, believable emotion, and detailed morphology | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🌇 Warm vs Cool Split Lighting | + | === 🔹 4. Fantasy Illustration Bias === |
| + | |||
| + | **When prompted with mythic or magical subjects, the model often falls into 2D fantasy illustration or 3D video-game rendering.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Evidence: | ||
| + | * warrior feels 3D-rendered and video-game-like | ||
| + | * mage feels like 2D fantasy illustration with rigid hands | ||
| + | * dragon is readable but weak and illustrative | ||
| + | * primordial titan becomes gloomy and otherworldly, | ||
| + | * fantasy runes are more successful because the prompt asks for surface symbolism rather than full mythic embodiment | ||
| - | <code txt> | + | 👉 //Fantasy surfaces work better than fantasy beings// |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </code> | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: color management, material response under mixed spectra | + | __Why it matters:__ |
| + | * Pros: useful for runes, magical surfaces, moody fantasy illustrations, | ||
| + | * Cons: weaker for awe, physical creature design, mythic scale, and convincing fantasy bodies | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🧩 Structured | + | === 🔹 5. Simple Environment Strength, Structural World Weakness |
| - | <code txt> | + | **The model can produce believable natural |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: baseline environment introduction, composition stability | + | __Evidence: |
| + | * landscape is credible, soothing, and atmospheric | ||
| + | * interior is cozy, warm, rich, catalog-like, | ||
| + | * aerial top-down is clear, satellite-like, | ||
| + | * cityscape looks acceptable in thumbnail but becomes absurd on inspection | ||
| + | * primordial titan respects the requested scale but feels layered onto the landscape | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //It can photograph a place, but struggles to make complicated worlds function// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters:__ | ||
| + | * Pros: good for landscapes, interiors, macro environments, | ||
| + | * Cons: weak for city infrastructure, | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🧱 Multi-object | + | === 🔹 6. Atmosphere as Mood Field === |
| - | <code txt> | + | **The model can create convincing atmosphere, especially when the prompt gives it a clear lighting or mood category, but results can become empty or overly literal.** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: object interaction, overlap handling, subject preservation | + | __Evidence: |
| + | * low-key moody is one of the stronger compositions, | ||
| + | * neon cyberpunk respects the style and mood clearly | ||
| + | * volumetric fog has a strong gloomy atmosphere but feels empty and washed | ||
| + | * overexposed washed is unusably bright, almost like a real failed exposure | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //Mood is present, but not always supported by strong composition// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters: | ||
| + | * Pros: good for gloom, low-key lighting, neon atmosphere, and stylized mood fields | ||
| + | * Cons: can become empty, washed out, or too literal when exposure and atmosphere are the core instruction | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🌿 Dense Environment | + | === 🔹 7. Physics Demonstration Strength |
| + | |||
| + | **The model performs well on isolated material and physics prompts, especially when the effect is central and visually bounded.** | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Evidence: | ||
| + | * water splash is clear and readable | ||
| + | * smoke and fire have convincing chaotic energy | ||
| + | * reflective material is strong, with a semi-translucent object choice adding interest | ||
| + | * impact successfully conveys force, fragments, and energy | ||
| - | <code txt> | + | 👉 //It handles physical effects best when they are the subject, not background |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </code> | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: environmental buildup, depth layering, readability under load | + | __Why it matters:__ |
| + | * Pros: strong for visual demonstrations of materials, reflection, fracture, particles, and isolated motion | ||
| + | * Cons: these strengths may not transfer to complex narrative scenes with many interacting systems | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🧹 Controlled Clutter | + | === 🔹 8. Symbolic and Abstract Competence |
| - | <code txt> | + | **The model shows a notable strength |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: disorder tolerance, composition resilience, semi-chaotic balance | + | __Evidence: |
| + | * fantasy runes have a convincing 2D fantasy illustration vibe | ||
| + | * complex pattern produces a good premium object | ||
| + | * abstract emotion is energetic, with cross patterns and waves of color | ||
| + | * readable text is respected and legible | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //When the prompt becomes symbolic, the model becomes more expressive// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters: | ||
| + | * Pros: strong for abstract art, magical surfaces, visual symbols, pattern objects, and mood-driven non-representational imagery | ||
| + | * Cons: weaker when symbolic ambition must coexist with realistic anatomy, architecture, or full-scene logic | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === 🌪 Chaos === | + | === 🔹 9. Thumbnail Plausibility Risk === |
| - | <code txt> | + | **Some outputs look convincing at small size but reveal structural problems when examined closely.** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around the object, realistic materials, cinematographic, | + | |
| - | </ | + | |
| - | 👉 Tests: entropy handling, subject anchoring under stress, structural collapse | + | __Evidence: |
| + | * cityscape initially passes as a city, but roads and buildings become absurd on inspection | ||
| + | * symmetry prompt respects composition but produces a fake-feeling building | ||
| + | * primordial titan has strong mood but unresolved physical integration | ||
| + | * fashion editorial respects the prompt but exposes the photo backdrop and feels cheap | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //The model often gets the image impression before it solves the image logic// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters:__ | ||
| + | * Pros: usable for thumbnails, quick references, atmosphere, and ideation | ||
| + | * Cons: requires close inspection before using outputs as finished or large-format images | ||
| ---- | ---- | ||
| - | === ⚔️ Chaos vs Control Conflict | + | === 🔹 10. Controlled Stability with Uneven Aesthetic Lift === |
| - | <code txt> | + | **The model is stable and often competent, but its aesthetic impact varies strongly by domain.** |
| - | an old worn book with a thick leather cover, slightly weathered edges and visible page layers, simple embossed details on the cover, resting on a flat surface, closed, low angle shot, fully visible, centered in frame, slight margin around | + | |
| - | </ | + | __Evidence: |
| + | * abstract, macro, fantasy runes, complex patterns, physics, low-key, narrative discovery, interior, and landscape are the strongest areas | ||
| + | * fashion editorial is prompt-compliant but lacks energy and composition strength | ||
| + | * battlefield chaos contains chaos but is not especially compelling | ||
| + | * mythic characters are readable but not powerful | ||
| + | |||
| + | 👉 //It is dependable, but only selectively inspiring// | ||
| + | |||
| + | __Why it matters: | ||
| + | * Pros: good candidate for controlled tests, symbolic images, materials, interiors, macro, and atmospheric visuals | ||
| + | * Cons: not a first choice for fashion drama, complex cities, anatomical precision, epic scale, or high-impact fantasy heroes | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| - | 👉 Tests: conflict resolution hierarchy, chaos vs readability prioritization | ||